Governance Library

Complaints, Concerns and Compliments Policy

An open, timely and learning-focused approach to feedback of every kind.

Governance & Quality
Responsive
Caring
Well-led

Purpose

To ensure concerns are welcomed, resolved promptly and used to improve the service, with no detriment to the person raising them.

Scope

All feedback from people using the service, families, staff, visitors and professionals.

Process and timescales

Acknowledgement within three working days, full written response within 20 working days, with interim updates if longer.

Complainants are told how to escalate to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman or the relevant commissioner.

Learning

Every complaint is themed and reported to the monthly governance review; outcomes are shared with the team and, where appropriate, with all families.

Training and competency

All staff receive induction training on this policy before working unsupervised, refreshed at least annually or sooner following incident learning or a change in guidance.

Competency is confirmed through observation of practice, supervision discussion and reflective questioning — not attendance records alone.

Training records are maintained centrally and gaps are reviewed monthly against the training matrix.

Governance, monitoring and accountability

The registered manager holds overall accountability for this policy. Day-to-day implementation is delegated to named leads recorded in the service's accountability matrix.

Compliance is monitored through the service audit calendar, with findings reported to the monthly governance review and escalated to the provider board where risk is rated high.

Every audit finding is converted into an entry on the improvement action tracker with a named owner, priority rating, target date and evidence of completion.

Learning is shared with the whole team through team meetings, supervision and reflective practice sessions. Where a theme recurs, the policy itself is reviewed rather than the individual blamed.

Managing risk
  • Complaints log with response-time monitoring.
  • Low complaint volume is treated as a possible barrier to reporting, not as evidence of quality.
Reducing harm
  • Where a complaint reveals harm, the safeguarding and Duty of Candour processes are triggered in parallel.
Reducing inequalities
  • Complaints procedures are available in easy-read, large print and community languages, and support to complain is offered.
  • Complaints data is reviewed for whether some groups are under-represented in feedback.

Evidence of compliance

  • Complaints log
  • Response letters
  • Theme analysis and resulting actions

Suggested review cycle: Annually.

Templates and governance documents are provided as editable starting points. Providers remain responsible for adapting, approving and implementing them in line with their own regulatory obligations.